id attribute value is unique
- Rule Type:
- atomic
- Rule ID:
- 3ea0c8
- Last Modified:
- Jun 14, 2021
- Accessibility Requirements Mapping:
- 4.1.1 Parsing (Level A)
- Required for conformance to WCAG 2.0 and later on level A and higher
- Outcome mapping:
- Any
failed
outcomes: success criterion is not satisfied - All
passed
outcomes: success criterion needs further testing - An
inapplicable
outcome: success criterion needs further testing
- Any
- H93: Ensuring that id attributes are unique on a Web page
- Not required to conformance to any W3C accessibility recommendation.
- Outcome mapping:
- Any
failed
outcomes: technique is not satisfied - All
passed
outcomes: technique is satisfied - An
inapplicable
outcome: technique is satisfied
- Any
- Input Aspects:
- DOM Tree
Description
This rule checks that all id
attribute values on a single page are unique.
Applicability
This rule applies to any id
attribute whose value is not an empty string (""
), specified on a HTML or SVG element.
Note: Elements that are neither included in the accessibility tree nor visible are still considered for this rule.
Expectation
The value of the attribute is unique across all other id
attributes specified on HTML or SVG elements that exist within the same document tree or shadow tree as the element on which the applicable id
attribute is specified.
Assumptions
There are currently no assumptions.
Accessibility Support
There are no major accessibility support issues known for this rule.
Background
- Understanding Success Criterion 4.1.1: Parsing
- H93: Ensuring that id attributes are unique on a Web page
Test Cases
Passed
Passed Example 1
There is only one id
attribute within the document context.
<div id="my-div">This is my first element</div>
Passed Example 2
All id
attributes are unique within the document context.
<div id="my-div1">This is my first element</div>
<div id="my-div2">This is my second element</div>
<svg id="my-div3">This is my third element</svg>
Passed Example 3
Two of the id
attributes are the same (my-elt
), but they are in different trees (the first one in the document tree and the second in the shadow tree).
<div id="my-elt"></div>
<div id="host"></div>
<script>
var host = document.getElementById('host')
var shadow = host.attachShadow({ mode: 'open' })
shadow.innerHTML = '<b id="my-elt"></b>'
</script>
Passed Example 4
Both id
attributes are the same (my-elt
), but they are in different document trees because the iframe
is creating a new one.
<div id="my-elt"></div>
<iframe title="Empty frame" srcdoc="<span id='my-elt'></span>"></iframe>
Failed
Failed Example 1
The id
attribute label
is not unique among all id
attributes in the document, resulting in a wrong programmatic label on the input field.
<div id="label">Name</div>
<div id="label">City</div>
<input aria-labelledby="label" type="text" name="city" />
Failed Example 2
The id
attribute label
is not unique among all id
attributes in the document, resulting in a wrong programmatic label on the input field.
<div id="label">Name</div>
<svg id="label">
<text x="0" y="15">City</text>
</svg>
<input aria-labelledby="label" type="text" name="city" />
Failed Example 3
The id
attribute label
is not unique among all id
attributes in the document, resulting in a wrong programmatic label on the input field. This rule still considers elements that are neither included in the accessibility tree nor visible.
<span id="label" style="display: none;">Name</span>
<span id="label">City</span>
<input aria-labelledby="label" type="text" name="city" />
Inapplicable
Inapplicable Example 1
There is no id
attribute in this document.
<div>This is my first element</div>
Inapplicable Example 2
The xml:id
attribute is not considered by this rule.
<div xml:id="my-div">This is my first element</div>
Inapplicable Example 3
These id
attributes have an empty value.
<span id="">Hello</span> <span id="">world!</span>
Glossary
Focusable
Elements that can become the target of keyboard input as described in the HTML specification of focusable and can be focused.
Included in the accessibility tree
Elements included in the accessibility tree of platform specific accessibility APIs. Elements in the accessibility tree are exposed to assistive technologies, allowing users to interact with the elements in a way that meet the requirements of the individual user.
The general rules for when elements are included in the accessibility tree are defined in the core accessibility API mappings. For native markup languages, such as HTML and SVG, additional rules for when elements are included in the accessibility tree can be found in the HTML accessibility API mappings (working draft) and the SVG accessibility API mappings (working draft).
For more details, see examples of included in the accessibility tree.
Note: Users of assistive technologies might still be able to interact with elements that are not included in the accessibility tree. An example of this is a focusable element with an aria-hidden
attribute with a value of true
. Such an element could still be interacted using sequential keyboard navigation regardless of the assistive technologies used, even though the element would not be included in the accessibility tree.
Outcome
An outcome is a conclusion that comes from evaluating an ACT Rule on a test subject or one of its constituent test target. An outcome can be one of the three following types:
- Inapplicable: No part of the test subject matches the applicability
- Passed: A test target meets all expectations
- Failed: A test target does not meet all expectations
Note: A rule has one passed
or failed
outcome for every test target. When there are no test targets the rule has one inapplicable
outcome. This means that each test subject will have one or more outcomes.
Note: Implementations using the EARL10-Schema can express the outcome with the outcome property. In addition to passed
, failed
and inapplicable
, EARL 1.0 also defined an incomplete
outcome. While this cannot be the outcome of an ACT Rule when applied in its entirety, it often happens that rules are only partially evaluated. For example, when applicability was automated, but the expectations have to be evaluated manually. Such “interim” results can be expressed with the incomplete
outcome.
Programmatic Label
Element L is a programmatic label of target element T if either:
- T is a labeled control of L; or
- L is referenced by ID in the
aria-labelledby
attribute of T.
For more details, see examples of programmatic label.
Note: a given element may have more than one programmatic label.
Visible
Content perceivable through sight.
Content is considered visible if making it fully transparent would result in a difference in the pixels rendered for any part of the document that is currently within the viewport or can be brought into the viewport via scrolling.
For more details, see examples of visible.
Acknowledgements
This rule was written in the ACT Rules community group, with the support of the EU-funded WAI-Tools Project.
Authors
Changelog
This is the first version of this ACT rule.
Back to Top